|
Dear Sadashivan
Really, I dont like the way you describe reality. You use a bulk of metaphors without asking if one or all of these images have a certain meaning. E.g. what do you mean by "negative" or "positive"? What do you want to say by a paragraph like
"Fire (spark) is reaction, produced by friction of two substances in negative and positive (opposite) directions. Fire seeks help of substance for its extension. It is the substance that helps fire to become furious. So intensity of fire depends on power of substances. Unemployment, poverty and illiteracy are as substances that help terrorisms to gain strength and become furious"
let alone a furious melange between imagination and real life?
IF communication shall be possible, it is necessary that all the participants use words with conventional meaning (conventional in the essential sense of the word); if we talk about different meaning using the same words - communication will always fail
Roger
|